|
|
 Originally Posted by Donachello
At FR a lot of times I'll take the bet check bet line with AK on a board like this, however, I think that betting the turn is probably better cause of the spade draw we picked up (thoughts on the turn?)
I really hate bet bet c/fing TPTK here or anywhere really since it gives villain the option to destroy us with any missed draws. I almost want to bet like 1.50 on the river and expect to get called by any Kx and almost any Qx. Villain is only going to jam better but you can still milk the other hands for a bit more value. This may be thin considering the villain but I dunno. c/f could actually be better here given the stats since this player seems to be the type who literally never bluffs though I think philly is wrong when he says that vill never bets AK when checked to but that is a tiny part of his range.
1- i agree i like a bet/check/bet line a lot better...im never as worried about backdoor flushes (although obviously still cautious when someone goes nuts after they complete)
2- hes 28/0 what is he ever going nuts with? also what missed draws can he have? he picked up SDV with QT and he just completed a straight with AT and T9 (if they are in his range ldo)
3- if, like tyrn says, he has all the way down to K4s then this is a lot more bet/foldy cause he has K5s, k6s, k8s, k9s
4- reason i bump it to 60 pre is because fish that are 28/0 will generally be willing to call .6 just as much as .45 after they limp and that forces them to make a bigger mistake while we are crushing them. Also if BB decides to come along we has great SPR when an A or K hits to get it in without ever having to bet over 2/3 pot (minor bonus, my biggest concern is exploiting the fish for more preflop when theres like 0 difference in what hes calling each bet with)
|
Reply With Quote
