Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,304,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

RAKE - % of pot and % of winnings

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default RAKE - % of pot and % of winnings

    I was just thinking how much of a killer rake can be at lower levels. I've played 22.5k hands at $25NL, winning $855 but paying $450 in rake on top of that, so may ratio of profit:rake is 1.9:1. For all pots played at that level, the average rake taken was 4.39%. I've also played 17.5k hands at $50NL winning $1180 but paying $540 in rake so the same ratio is 2.19:1. For all pots played at that level, the average rake taken was 4.33%

    I'm thinking of moving up levels to $100NL and am hoping rake will become slightly less of an issue because I figured more pots would be breaking the $60 mark at which the rake is capped at the site I play. Does anyone have any figures for rake %s or profit:rake ratios at different levels (I realise the 2nd is heavily dependent on how well you're doing generally). Thanks
  2. #2
    Verde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    27
    Location
    In a floating casino somewhere in the sea
    FIsherman where are u playing?
    Look if there somehow trade points into cash, or into 'prizes' that u can sell afterwards, o even use them to join events.

    Some site give in this way your Rakeback, not a so good way, but works too.
  3. #3
    I play on Everest. They don't offer rakeback but I have got a $75 bonus each month since I signed up there about 6 months ago after clearing so many points in a month. It's not bad but I would like something more consistent, and I'me reluctant to look elsewhere because Everest is a great site, much better than all the American ones anyhow
  4. #4
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    The rake is pretty killer at 100nl and below for most online poker sites. At 200nl I think is where it typically starts slowing down a bit.
  5. #5
    Rake is the number one reason I want to move up to 200NL ASAP.

    The difference between 50NL and 100NL was nice to see, but the difference between 100NL and 200NL should be even greater I believe.

    Some recent numbers for me.

    14989 hands 50NL +$356 2.38 BB/Hour $569 rake
    6609 hands 100NL +$563 4.18 BB/Hour $370 rake.

    If you normalize my BB/hour to 2.38, 100NL gives me 321 profit:370 rake, while 50NL is 356:569.

    This works out to me paying $1.18 in rake per $1 won at 100NL, versus $1.59 per $1 won at 50NL.

    Thankfully I'm getting some rakeback, but it's still pretty brutal at these stakes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All content
©  2003 - 2025
FlopTurnRiver.com
Testimonials  |   Terms & Conditions  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  

FTR is your home for Texas Holdem Strategy, Poker Forum, Poker Tools & Poker Videos
https://www.flopturnriver.com/copyscape.gif
DMCA.com