|
|
 Originally Posted by derekeverett
I wasn't aware there was a big difference.. so thanks.. information is nice to have.
when I first played on tilt 10NL and below got raked 10%, it was catastrophic unless you were some kind of god. For me it killed my win rate by about 75% and probably made a lot of winning players on stars loses on FT. My account is years and years old so i dont get rakeback. Now i believe its not quite so bad as the rake has been reduced. The figures are pretty horrible, I've seen peoples stats from ~20000 hands at FT 10NL who were losing/breakeven, had they played on stars they'd have been up ~$120
some more info here Rake and Rakeback at the Micro Stakes: A Critical Review
anyway, you have rakeback so it doesnt matter so much to you.. just know that if you're only a marginal winner and your winnings seem to be coming from rakeback its because FT are greedy mofos
|
Reply With Quote
