|
Re: Your tips for best table selection
so, this is an 'in theory' daven approach to table selection.
Table selection is not the same as fish hunting, unless it is.
my notes are also colour coded.
Red are the good players, typically the 2-4/3-6/5-10 regs that drop down sometimes when there aren't good games running higher, i think I grant 'red status' to only 3 regs at my stakes.
Green is the default and i leave the notes that way until I develop reads that mean I want to always sit with the player
Purple means dead money.
Cool thing about this approach is that I can see at a glance in the lobby whether a table is reg-filled (green), scary (red), or full-o-fish.
So, I typically sort the tables by pot-size and look through the top-ten and decide which i want to wait-list/join. Then I go through the tables, waitlisting those I want to join. Typically this is about purple notes, deep unknowns, or some other combo of deepness vs unknowns and reg:unknown ratios.
Also, players with 70-95bb and unknown are typically fish.
What I am trying to do right now is assess table conditions every time it's my turn to post a blind, and leave if I should. Good reasons to leave include: out-of-position vs players where that is causing problems, >5 shortstacks (<30bb) and nothing to balance that out, a table that I know is a lot stronger than is typical for the stakes (this unfortunately applies at some times of day, so i just deal with it).
relative position vs maniacs and LAGs definitely plays a huge role.
when i find an uber-fish at a table I typically Ctrl-f and waitlist any other tables that are in my stakes comfort range (I typically won't bother if they're sitting above 2-4).
Other times
occasionally/often (matter of perception) I simply join the tables with empty seats or start my own until I'm running enough. Then I just go-for-coma.
|