| 
		 
	 | 
		
			
			
			
					
					
			
				
					
						
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  swiggidy
					
				 
				I was playing 50NL 6max pre  UIGEA and I could run 16/14 and show the same  winrate I did playing 30/25
 
1)  I was better  post- flop (they were terrible, not saying I' m good) 
2) They basically played they're  own cards
 
It doesn't matter if you're  tight at 10NL because they're playing their cards, not your  image.  They might notice you're more aggressive, but they won't relate it to starting hand selection.  You can  open up and get some experience  post flop and reading hands, but opening up (giving  action to get  action) it won't directly help your win rate at 10NL.
 
1 exemption is if you have  position on a spewy ATM.  You can  raise almost any 2 for  isolation.  
			
		 
	 
 +1. 
 you don't need to worry about being a great player at micros because there's enough bad players to destroy just using ABC fundamental poker. just worry about getting a good winrate to move up levels so you can get to a level with thinking players. then, start learning to play. that might sound kinda counter-intuitive but its not. the easiest analogy to use would be playing a video game on easy. it takes you 20 minutes to learn a basic strategy and then you run with it until you beat the game. so there's no real learning involved. move up to medium difficulty, and you find that basic strategy didn't work. so now, you are forced to do one of three things: create a new winning strategy, tweak the one you have, or a little bit of both. And then.........you get to legendary and you find out the invisible elites have your number, so you have to do the process again. poker's the same way. if playing only 8 hands is going to win you money (because you know, thats your goal right? to make money?) then do it until you aren't winning money. then find out why you aren't and tweak.
					 
				 
				
			 
			 
		  
	 |