|
|
 Originally Posted by HalvSame
Originally Posted by jackvance
I think the point of that rule was exactly that noone folds a full house, even if they are obviously beat.
Is my sarcasm detector malfunctioning here? You're not actually saying that we can't fold this hand because we have a full house?
This is an obvious fold, I'm just repeating what the rule was. It basically goes like.. if you have an obvious overfull to your opponent, just go allin even if it's a preposterous overbet like $50 on a $10 pot. That is because a lot of people can't fold full houses, even the obviously beat ones.
|
Reply With Quote
