He doesnt have only 22-88 in his range, idk where you got that from. All im talking about is compensating for the fact that he could have 22, in his range, but doesn't always.

@RPM I'm not saying this is something we should consider often. Thing is like random bluffs are put into villain's range sooo seldom when honestly they can make up a decent portions of ranges in some spots.

Quote Originally Posted by scott_owen View Post
example 2..

if he's only got 22-88, give me a reason for a reg villain to continue without the set on this flop.. which ofcourse leads me to the idea that i dont need to weight his range because his flop action is going to place it as either set or no set.

I also don't see a need to weight things to 66-88 when 99-QQ are also clearly in his range and AK. All of which makes our play pretty dependant on our hand, and less dependant on the likely hood that villain has 66-88..

are you going to check/fold the flop with AK here if the flop is KJ6 but cbet if its KJ3?

edit: I see you're underlying point, i just dont see a lot of value in it.. Unless all you're really saying is give good players more credit and bad players less, which is pretty standard play really.