i wouldnt say i use an "aggressive technique," but i DO think your numbers may be misleading. you are on two different sites. one has a reputation as "tough," and the other has a much softer reputation.

play 22k hands at FTP and strive for the same "passivity," then check your results again. i think you are somewhat comparing apples to oranges, as of now.

not that 25k hands is a large enough sample to prove squat, imo.

that was from a purely scientific/mathematical philosophy.

however, from intuition...

i think that tightish-passive-aggressive is the way to go, at lower stakes. see flops cheaply, or to a small raise, and BLAST the pot when you hit, slow-playing VERY rarely, bluffing almost never. and dropping almost everything to obvious aggression. you WILL get paid off.

however, once you have a handle on the more passive approach, i think you can "open up your game" a bit more. and by that i mean open your LIMPING range, not your raising range. if you get to 25%vpip, 7%pfr, and 3ishAF i think you are playing all sorts of decent "crap" for cheap...allowing you to maximize the TAGGY nits, as well as, keep the maniacal "throw caution to the wind" gambooolers paying off your premiums. just do it from position, and "hide" behind other limpers with your "trash." and by "trash" i mean suited connectors, small pp's, and suited gappers, with the occasional off-suit no gapper like 9T+ mixed in off the button.

just my .02