Agreed (dpe8598). Soupie's post about laying down KK was a good example of a read-influenced monster laydown. Your read must be almost 100% foolproof to justify laying down a set on an innocent-looking flop. How can you be sure you are not laying down to top 2 or a big draw?

I often read statements like "You need a SOLID READ to lay down your set to a suspected overset". What could this "solid read" possibly be?

Don't mean to hijack the thread, but it would be interesting if people could post some hh where they laid down sets confidently.