Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Alright, my thinking against a normal 100nl TAGG would be to play our draws aggressively if we have a good image.

Shoving over flop raises or at the very least threatening their stack seems to be a better play than just calling. This to me, applies more OOP than in position. In position I'm more willing to call to float/draw and manipulate the pot size. OOP I'd much rather c/r AI if the stack to pot-size ratio dictates. There are a few reasons for this:

1. Opponents are likely to over-value our range here, they tend to weight us range towards 2pr/set in these spots and not necessarily draws thereby giving us some semblance of fold equity.

2. We can now profitably fast-play our sets on more dangerous boards and be expected to get looked up more often than not.

Yea, that's me rambling, not as long as yours, but my 2 cents.
Yeah, I completely agree that most of my original post was pretty passive, and almost entirely in position.

OOP I'd much rather c/r AI if the stack to pot-size ratio dictates.
What sort of stack to pot-size ratio would you say makes this a good play? bad play? half-and-half? I'm still not up-to-date on a lot of stack to pot-size ratio stuff -- haven't gotten my copy of PNL yet