| 
		 
	 | 
		
			
			
			
					
					
			
				
					
						
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  HybridTt
					
				 
				
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  spoonitnow
					
				 
				I' m trying to reply to everyone, but if I miss you  don't take it personally.
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  daven
					
				 
				regardless of x,  hero shouldn't go pro.  
			
		 
	 
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  Cocco_Bill
					
				 
				You can not quit a job and go pro with a $1100  bankroll. Insanity!  
			
		 
	 
 What if X is  close to 0?
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  Andrew
					
				 
				So as long as your bills are less that $1,200 a month then you should think of going pro. 
			
		 
	 
 But that's more than our current  bankroll...?
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  pgil
					
				 
				x = about 200.  our hourly rate is irrelevant at this point.  more important is our  bankroll.  We would ideally want 3-4 months worth in reserve, over and above what we need to play.  
			
		 
	 
 This is the most logical response so far,  imo.
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  d0zer
					
				 
				Until I' m making about 1.5-3x (depending on how bad  variance is up there) my current income, I wouldn't...  
			
		 
	 
 Again, what if X is  close to 0? Also, if there was little to no chance of getting a  raise or any type of advancement in your job (which is typical of the jobs college students get)?
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  dev
					
				 
				Very few responses here are original.  This is a topic that's been rehashed repeatedly in magazines, articles, books, and message boards. 
			
		 
	 
 I agree, but perhaps that's because it's sometimes hard to be creative when there is a limited window of correct ways to do something and be successful.
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  dev
					
				 
				Going pro is as easy as quitting your job.  Assuming you're an adult and capable of going  broke and surviving the ordeal, fuck it.  Take your shot.  Learn your lesson.  
			
		 
	 
 This is soooooo wrong, but like you said it's just something you heard. There is so much more to it than "quit your job and see what happens", and the likelihood of succeeding with this approach depends heavily upon X.
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  cowboyardee
					
				 
				$600/week is more than $360/week, so assuming your benefits at work suck, x is a non-factor.  Or I guess you could say that if your added expenses (medical  insurance and such) after quitting your job add up to less than $240/week, you should do it in a strictly financial sense.  
			
		 
	 
 There's much more to it than the strict math, DOUCY?  
			
		 
	 
 R u serious op? All you answer with is questions that infer that peoples answers are wrong. On the last two you just  straight tell people their opinions are wrong... when this is a general opinion answer question. X is defined by each persons opinion. Also people are trying to  tell you, your question sucks because it does. OP  Heads up for rolls?  
			
		 
	 
 That's because I'm right, ldo.
					 
				 
				
			 
			 
		  
	 |