Rondavu, Big and Rich - how do you classify this style of play? I've been wondering that as it sounds like I play very similarly.
Most would probably say weak
tight I would guess.
And that may be right, but it seems more like there's a sliding scale on the weak side - meaning that you are weak when you have little to
draw on and improper odds (even with +EV), but you are aggressive with decent hands with good odds to
improve.
There are some 'weak' betters that will only bet 10c all the way to the
river with strong holdings - they are at the other end of the spectrum.
Tight weak is vulnerable to
loose aggressive in the short term. But it's almost a good thing for me. Take a few small hits against a
loose aggressive, realize that they are in this category - and then eventually you will bust them out.
Tight weak seems like it's even more vulnerable to
tight aggressive - but on an even less frequent basis - and hek in most of these situations I'
m not losing too much - less than a dollar.
The thing about this style - it is playing fine for me at the .05/.10
Pacific tables - but I'
m not sure how
well it's going to carry up (though it will be months before I move up anyway). If
moving up to that particular
level means I hit a lot more
TAG players, I will probably not do
well as I will be running into them more than my hands can
hold up at the
flop.