Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,304,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Implied odds.....

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Implied odds.....

    I'm figuring out that not using good implied odds skills is costing me money... Especially w/ shorties at the tables ...

    Can you guys help me out w/ some pricing info...

    Like say I have I'm 75-100bb'd w/ A5o in sb... a vp/55 pfr/22 moves AI on BU w/ 30bb's

    Are we calling him here?? Either way can you elaborate?
  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    allins are not really implied odds situations
    Implied odds are to do with calling draws without direct pot odds based on making up this deficit by villains putting in more $$ if you hit. Their bet implies they have a hand they like, from this you can infer that they will continue to put in money on later streets.

    people generally over-estimate their implied odds in a lot of spots
  3. #3

    Default ok

    Quote Originally Posted by daven View Post
    allins are not really implied odds situations
    Implied odds are to do with calling draws without direct pot odds based on making up this deficit by villains putting in more $$ if you hit. Their bet implies they have a hand they like, from this you can infer that they will continue to put in money on later streets.

    people generally over-estimate their implied odds in a lot of spots
    okey dokey,

    So I guess this would just be an EV-AI situation???

    I downloaded 'Poker Math That Matters' by Owen Gaines' .pdf, and yeah now I realize that def isn't an implied odds situation.

    Anyone ever check this book out? It explained implied odds to me well, but there are a lot of situations where using the rule of 4/2 that the equity is like 3-4% off that of pokerstove or equilab.. that can be the deciding factor in a call in my eyes...

    There is also little graphs he uses for pot odds & implied odds

    They go something like this:
    pot odds
    2x pot bet needs 40% equity
    pot bet needs 33%
    2/3 pot needs 28%
    1/2 pot needs 25%
    1/4 pot needs 16%

    implied odds:
    if our equity is 35% multiply 2x opp bet, and thats how much more we need for implied odds to be correct.

    25% need 3x opp bet to continue

    Example:
    if we have 25% equity in hand
    pot= $10 opp bets $7.50
    7.50 x 3 = $22.50
    17.50 - 22.50 = 4
    So opp needs at least $4 dollars for us to call..

    Do you guys agree? Just wanna make sure I'm using good advice.
  4. #4
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by WeldPhaser View Post
    Example:
    if we have 25% equity in hand
    pot= $10 opp bets $7.50
    7.50 x 3 = $22.50
    17.50 - 22.50 = 4
    So both Hero and opp needs at least $4 dollars for us to call, and opp must be willing to get the $4 in the pot when Hero hits.
    This is correct.

    At 25%, you are a 3:1 against.
    (ESS) > (odds)*(bet) - (pot)
    Effective Stack Size = the stuff in bold (in this example)
  5. #5

    Default cool

    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    This is correct.

    At 25%, you are a 3:1 against.
    (ESS) > (odds)*(bet) - (pot)
    Effective Stack Size = the stuff in bold (in this example)
    OK,

    I just wanna make sure what I'm using to study is correct...
  6. #6

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All content
©  2003 - 2025
FlopTurnRiver.com
Testimonials  |   Terms & Conditions  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  

FTR is your home for Texas Holdem Strategy, Poker Forum, Poker Tools & Poker Videos
https://www.flopturnriver.com/copyscape.gif
DMCA.com