|
How far should you take a called bluff/steal attempt?
I apologize for not having the HH, but I'm at work at the moment.
Setting: Ring NL .25/.50 game. The table is limp-happy with 4-6 limpers almost every hand, but with most folding to a 3-4xBB raise. I'm SB w/ 23o and everyone limps to me. I figure I'll take a shot, and raise it 7xBB. I get one caller in MP (maybe UTG+1). Flop comes JJ9 rainbow. I'm thinking, well, he may have hit something, so I check. To my surprise, he checks behind. Turn card was a 6, and in thinking about his previous check, I bet out $3.00, which is about a 1/3 pot-sized bet. He calls. River is another rag, 4 or 5, iirc. I figure he's not letting go of the hand and I check the river, so does he. He turns over AK, and I turn over my 23 and get ridiculed to no end. I laughed along w/ them, but the reality of it is if I carry the bluff onto the flop and turn, I almost certainly take this down.
Known / obvious criticisms of how I played this:
1.) I tried to steal out of position, which I think is the worst thing out of everything else wrong that I did. But, I sensed weakness with all the limpers, and if I get reraised, I would have let it go.
2.) I didn't follow through with the bluff on the flop, mainly because I had to act first, which takes us back to #1.
3.) I didn't bet enough on the turn to cause him to give up his hand. If I make a 3/4 to full pot-sized bet, maybe he lets it go.
I think those were the most obvious problems, but I welcome any other criticisms/suggestions.
After showing this bluff, it affected my table image positively for me, because when I did get a decent hand after this, I had more callers.
My question is, though, playing the hand as I did, without betting out on the flop and betting weak on the turn, should I follow through with a big bet on the river or did I make the right move to cut my losses and move on to the next hand?
|