|
So it seems Star's covered a lot of this already but I figured I'd help out a bit and get you thinking about ranges for each of your villains - on each street.
 Originally Posted by Tasha
Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is CO with Q A
4 folds, MP2 raises to $0.07, Hero raises to $0.12, BTN calls $0.12, 1 fold, BB calls $0.10, MP2 calls $0.05
I raised him because I am trying to get out of the habit of limping in CO or button with hands like this. If I'm going to play it then I'll raise it.
Step 1 here is to put together a decent raising range for your villain. Lacking reads we can assume a rational opponent, break-even (minus rake) over the long term, neither tight nor laggy; i.e. we assume total averages. This will help you think about unknowns. I want to qualify this by saying that some others treat unknowns as total passives and thus give more weight to their aggression; that's fine too. Some may even suggest my assumption is incorrect, and there is an argument to be made for that as well.
A few things to consider when putting MP2 on a range:
A) His position. He's in MP2, otherwise known as the HJ (hijack). This is a location where stealing is common. We assign a wider range due to this.
B) The stats of the players in the blinds. The tighter they are, the wider a range MP2 will open.
C) The 3-bet percentage of players behind, including those in the blinds. The more often they play back to preflop raises, the less likely MP2 is to open, and the tighter his range will be.
D) His tendencies. You mention you have no particular reads other than being a typical micro noob, however even looking over a smallish sample of 30 or 40 hands should tell you whether he is apt to try to steal or not. This is possible even without a HUD. Naturally, the more likely he is to steal, the wider his range will be.
E) Other factors such as stack sizes, perceived reads etc. I'll leave these for your own research.
Since you provided nothing other than 'A', we'll assume a wider than normal range. I figure something along the lines of (22+,A2s+,K5s+,Q8s+,J8s+,T7s+,97s+,87s,76s,65s,A4o +,K9o+,Q9o+,JTo) is reasonable. This is a shade under 33% of hands.
Once you've put MP2 on a range, you decide your best course of action given the factors at hand. You decided to minraise here, and you now face a call from the BTN and the BB. Ask yourself what type of hands are these players likely to call with here, facing a preflop 3.5x open from the HJ and a minraise from the CO?
Further, how does your minraise affect the range of MP2 (once he calls)? I'll leave these to you as an exercise - I'm hoping this will shed light on why your minraise is not an effective play.
As for postflop - I don't really have time to type up a treatise on the subject of hand ranges (and probably am not qualified to do so) - but I'll give you a little food for thought and hope you can piece together everything else that went on in this hand.
Whenever you bet, ask yourself the following questions: "Am I getting called by worse?" and "am I folding better?"; in this particular situation you had TPTK on AKTr, and face 2 checks with 1 to act behind. Does Ax check/call? Maybe, maybe not, but it's certainly possible. Does KQ call, KJ, QT, JT? Obviously, this is a very wet board and you stand to earn value from weaker holdings, so betting is natural.
To get an idea on sizing, ask yourself what parts of your opponents 1/2 pot bet calling range would be folded out when facing a large bet, say 3/4 or pot-size. If the difference is marginal, or otherwise relatively small, then a larger bet is necessary.
Alright, I'm sort of out of time. I suggest you try putting each villain on a range on every street, figuring out their continuing ranges to your bets and so on.
|