Quote Originally Posted by RHCNNN
Imagine you're sitting down and some guy buyins for half the max, and triples up on one hand, then he says "ok, I'm only playing with my original buyin now, I'm keeping the profit I made on that hand, so the most you can bet against me is still only ____"
Its bullshit, it makes the competition unfair... Its like using the allin protect multiple times per game.
I'll just say this... the reason there is nothing wrong with someone "banking" a large increase in their buy in and then starting over at the same table is the same reason you or any site can't figure out how long that person should be banned from the table minus their full winnings when they do so.

Think of the logic. Should it be 15 minutes? Should it be 45? Should they be banned from that table for 2 days minus the full winnings? Should they never be allowed to sit on that table again if they don't have 3x buy in? What if that person wins 3x their buy in, leaves to sit at another table, and loses all but 1x buy in back to your table. Should they not be allowed to sit at the original table simply because all the money they have to their name is 1x buy in after their losses on that other table. What if the only action on the whole site at that moment is the original table he's not qualified to sit at?

There are a million and one holes in the logical reasoning. That's why it's incorrect to penalize the activity. You tell me how long they should be banned from the table and why that long? If you don't have an exact answer to that question that makes sense, then I'm afraid the argument stands invalid.