Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,304,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

forming ranges around exploitive play.

Results 1 to 22 of 22

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #4
    rpm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,084
    Location
    maaaaaaaaaaate
    thanks for responding. as for your statement regarding his stack-off frequency with AK, we never have enough equity to 3b KK with intentions of stacking off against KK+,AKs,AKo, as we only have


    equity win tie pots won pots tied
    Hand 0: 47.293% 43.79% 03.51% 67479612 5402286.00 { KK }
    Hand 1: 52.707% 49.20% 03.51% 75823176 5402286.00 { KK+, AKs, AKo }

    47% equity. of course this is based on two assumptions, namely:
    - that we never want to 3b a hand that won't have >50% equity vs his stacking off range
    - that he doesn't 4b QQ (which seems reasonable for such a nit, and a very low 4b frequency)

    the first of those two points was one of the stumbling blocks i encountered in making the original post, so it could well be wrong. if you're interested, the main reason i held that assumption can be found in the first post in this thread:
    Some Pre-Flop 3-Betting Concerns

    which basically states exactly what i said (unless i misinterpreted)

    as for your analogy with rock/paper/scissors, i don't think this is accurate/applicable. i know that, due to his fold frequency, i can literally 3bet ANY two cards and have it be +EV in a vacuum. but the idea of forming our whole range isn't concerned with what plays are +EV in a vacuum, i don't think, but instead how to form or range to maximise the EV of the whole range versus his range in these situations. i base this comment around two sections of your post:

    "he can't immediately exploit your wider 3betting range."

    and

    "I'm not saying your longterm strategy should be to throw rock in this type of spot 100% of the time, but he can't adjust before you do it, so go for it."

    in this case, i am very definitely trying to determine my long-term strategy, because, as i mentioned, if this hand was played in a complete vacuum, i could 3bet any two as a bluff and be +EV. and thus i'd probably keep the "3bet for value", and "flat-call" ranges as they are, and turn ALL the rest of my possible holdings into my 3b bluff range (because every single hand i could hold has a positive expectation if i 3bet it here). but the thing is, i'm not considering this in a vacuum. and i obviously can't 3bet 70% of hands in these spots. because he will wake up.

    again, i'm a fish. i know that there is every chance i am wrong here. but these are my thoughts in response to your post.
    Last edited by rpm; 05-11-2011 at 01:18 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All content
©  2003 - 2025
FlopTurnRiver.com
Testimonials  |   Terms & Conditions  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  

FTR is your home for Texas Holdem Strategy, Poker Forum, Poker Tools & Poker Videos
https://www.flopturnriver.com/copyscape.gif
DMCA.com