Quote Originally Posted by thirteen

Don't get mad because you missed the context of the post and come back trying to attack me. You read a post about playing conservative in the SB and then asked me how I'd play a 75 offsuit, I WOULDN'T PLAY IT. If you disagree thats fine, disagree and make a good post. Don't ask how I would play a junk hand after I've said that I wouldn't play junk in the small blind. You're begging the question. If you read the entire post, you'd see how first i talk about not playing junk, then go on to say in point two that I'd raise the hands I'd be willing to play. WHY? because they wouldn't be 75o gappers... they'd be legit hands like high PPs and AKs.

I want you to disagree with me, but make a good point. Don't dispute point two without understanding point one. Understand what my post is about, and dispute it. I want to here why you play loose in the BB, but don't ask me ridiculous questions about why I'd want to raise a junk hand, when I said i wouldn't even play them. Can we get back discussing SB play now?
You accused me of missing the point when in fact I understood what you were saying, but tried to point out to you that your suggestion of raising or folding from the small blind is not optimal and that just completing in the SB is often correct. Fact of the matter is that you can play a hand like 75o for a profit from the SB if you play well post flop.