I have a question about the inverse of "He is bluffing syndrome." I know that there's always about a 10% chance or so that after any given bet, a player could be bluffing, but I seem to have the problem that I tend to give a LOT of credit to raises and re-raises and I feel that no-one is bluffing. Any advice on how to get over this, despite working on timely reads and picking up on betting patterns?
Other then reads I dont know of any other ways to detect bluffing. However in Sngs you usually have enough time to get basic reads on the players in the early stages, and use them in later stages