Quote Originally Posted by michael1123
I did this move in a casino recently.

It was a $100 minimum buyin (no maximum) NL ring table with blinds of 2-2-5 (and I had built my stack up to about $1.8k after buying in for $400). A very loose aggressive, not so good (in my opinion) player that had bought in for at least $3k and had pissed away at least $1k of that before this hand, and seemed like he was kind of tiltish.

I picked up JJ in the SB, and the guy raised it to like $20 in semi-early position (which meant nothing with this guy). I reraised to $80, everyone else folded, and he called. The flop came JT3 rainbow, and I checked. He bet $100, and I raised it to $300 and he called. A 9 came on the turn (also putting two of a suit on the board), and now I was a bit worried that he could have a straight (KQ would probably play the hand identically to how he had up to this point). Not wanting to lose my entire deep stack if he did have one, I checked the turn to him, planning on just calling if he bet big, and hoping for the river to pair so I could double up on the river if he did have a straight.

He then only bets $200, and I was almost positive with this guy's style that he'd bet a lot more with a straight here, as he wasn't the type to slowplay (he's the type to bet huge with the nuts and try to get my entire stack after I've shown strength). So again, I check raise him, making it $800 this time. He calls.

The river comes a rag, and I know I have him now. I put in $300 thinking he'll have to call that with anything, with such a big pot, and he does indeed call. He flips over his J8s (did pickup a flush draw on the turn), and I turn over my top set and scoop in a monster pot.

Normally I don't try and check raise a guy twice in one hand, but in this one it made sense to me, largely because I wanted to pick up on if he had caught a straight on the turn.

check raising twice in this situation is very very secular. i think the original post was about check raising twice when drawing, not when holding the (close to) nuts and seeing weakness in your opponent.

to syked, i agree...fish would probably check behind 50+% of the time, making the move worthwhile. but theres no way in hell im checking behind.