Quote Originally Posted by andy-akb
I thought you already were playing at $20NL?
I moved back down to 10NL because I wanted to be properly rolled for 20NL first. The play there is too high variance for a tighter BR.

Most of the moves that make lagg play profitable require folding equity that you just dont get at the micro limits.
That's the main point. This is changing. 10NL at unibet has a lot of folding equity on most tables, believe it or not. That's why I started playing Lagg. If they were as loose as you guys say the lower limits "should be" (and probably are at some sites? - although the general consensus seems to be that it's changing everywhere) then I'd be playing much tighter.

I'm really advocating a more liberal approach to the whole "tight is right" stigma. If you feed this advice to new players, and they end up at tighter tables, they're just going to get frustrated because it's not working like it should.

If you are a very good hand reader and can make the right laydowns with you loose play then it will be profitable, but to be successful at these levels a solid tag game should do just as well and probably better without putting as much money at risk.
Playing tight amongst tight players is not the highest EV strategy.