AKs deep HU

Originally Posted by DoubleJ

or, Coby, as the Good Book puts it:

"When I played 2NL, I spoke 2NL, I understood 2NL, I thought 2NL: but when I moved up, I put away 2NL things."

Praise be.

Some Poker Royalty ITT

I like.

I don't think most players at NL5 qualify as 'thinking' players (and almost certainly not this particular villain so I do agree with sizing it bigger pre. Can probably get a little bigger on flop and turn vs. this player too I guess.

But as to the decision in question, I'm having trouble grasping exactly why it's a flip-a-coin decision. I guess we don't expect this players stats to change a WHOLE lot as sample size increases. Maybe it's because bad players play bad and bad players do stupid/unpredictable things at stupid/unpredictable times?