45s fd in mp to ep tight agg

can anyone who said fold pre explain why? we have a pretty solid implied odds hand vs a full stacker, and were in position.

with regards to the hud, i would like to, but cake poker saves HHs with player names muddled by adding *** inside (eg., pl****1 instead of player1)

although I could just be wrong and I have my hud configured badly. if so, can anyone who plays on cake tell me how to fix this in pt3?

Originally Posted by Zorkion

can anyone who said fold pre explain why? we have a pretty solid implied odds hand vs a full stacker, and were in position.

You have a marginal hand that is often times dominated.

It's ok to call pre if your plan is to not get stupid by stacking off with bottom pair and a low FD but to get out of the hand cheaply unless you hit the flop hard, which is difficult with 54

Originally Posted by Shotglass

You have a marginal hand that is often times dominated.

It's ok to call pre if your plan is to not get stupid by stacking off with bottom pair and a low FD but to get out of the hand cheaply unless you hit the flop hard, which is difficult with 54

umm what?

Originally Posted by Shotglass

You have a marginal hand that is often times dominated.

It's ok to call pre if your plan is to not get stupid by stacking off with bottom pair and a low FD but to get out of the hand cheaply unless you hit the flop hard, which is difficult with 54

edit: oh snap i totally misread your post, nvm.

but yeah as the next post says and also already stated in OP obv it's not stupid to stack off vs likely ranges per stove results.

Originally Posted by Shotglass

You have a marginal hand that is often times dominated.

It's ok to call pre if your plan is to not get stupid by stacking off with bottom pair and a low FD but to get out of the hand cheaply unless you hit the flop hard, which is difficult with 54

umm wat please go punch in some common hands we'll get in v in pokerstove and then reconsider what you just said please.

Originally Posted by Icanhastreebet

umm wat please go punch in some common hands we'll get in v in pokerstove and then reconsider what you just said please.

Originally Posted by eugmac

edit: oh snap i totally misread your post, nvm.

but yeah as the next post says and also already stated in OP obv it's not stupid to stack off vs likely ranges per stove results.

Yeah, I understand all of this, but the OP asked for resoning to fold pre. So, ignoring the flop...
I still stand behind what I said for preflop, except that I should have called it a speculative hand. His specultaive hand becomes marginal because he's playing a bunch of short-stackers.

Originally Posted by Zorkion

can anyone who said fold pre explain why? we have a pretty solid implied odds hand vs a full stacker, and were in position.

with regards to the hud, i would like to, but cake poker saves HHs with player names muddled by adding *** inside (eg., pl****1 instead of player1)

although I could just be wrong and I have my hud configured badly. if so, can anyone who plays on cake tell me how to fix this in pt3?

it's really easy to overestimate the implied odds of crap hands. I call J9s here fwiw.

re hud - i've got no idea about cake. Maybe go search 2p2 threads? or go to the PT3 support forums?