|
|
 Originally Posted by Cobra_1878
I remember reading a post Spoon wrote about not 3betting with KQs but 3betting with KQo as he didn't feel you can call with KQo profitably.
I think what spoon was trying to point out is that you'd rather 3bet KQo than KQs because;
KQs has a lot more post-flop playability than KQo, this means you can play it aggressively on a variety of flops as a semi-bluff whilst KQo relies a lot more heavily on it's pair making ability, i.e when you flop a pair with KQo it's frequently going to be good at showdown. Although this can also be said for KQs as well you've just got far more playability with KQs why would you waste such a playable hand by 3betting it when you can 3bet KQo which has the same effect on the opponents range i.e the same amount of blockers, then call with your KQs combos which flop well and you can take down pots by playing your draws aggresively.
|
Reply With Quote
