Quote Originally Posted by rpm View Post
you realise that this is saying "i want to make less money/progress than i could", don't you?

also, your comparison of making $2 mistakes to $1000000 mistakes doesn't really hold, because they are just BB's in a bankroll, you should care as much about losing 100bb at 2nl as you should at 10knl imo (obviously easier said than done but that's the goal)

furthermore, your "learning how to play certain hands" logic is kind of bogus too imo. sure, you should always play the most hand combinations you can possibly play with a positive expectation. but it has been shown to you in this thread that calling preflop here does not have a positive expectation. so you should fold and learn to play 65s in a spot where it is actually possible for it to be a winning investment. extrapolating from your "i should learn how to play this hand now while at 2nl even if i'm shown it's -EV" statement, why don't you just call 100% of your range here and learn how to play every single hand on the matrix? i mean, if it doesn't matter to you whether the hands in your range have a positive or negative EV, fuck it, might as well get some experience playing 92o in these spots while you're at 2nl, right?
Because that would be dumb. 56s is a playable hand, 92o isn't.

Quote Originally Posted by daviddem View Post
^^ if you need more arguments to convince you, why don't you make a filter in PT3 for all the SC's you played OOP in raised pots to see if you are showing a profit?
What range of SC's should I use? Right up to AKs might sway things a little. A2s-T9s?